The Tactics of Michael Collins Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Tactics of Michael collins - Essay Example97-98). However, Collins also knew that something more was necessary than a guerrilla war in which small bands of our warriors attacked the larger gets of the enemy because England could always reinforce her army (Dwyer, 1990, p. 64). The tactic that arguably won the war was Collins execution of instrument of the Squad which, together with his extensive intelligence network, was able to systematically assassinate British agents and thus cut of Britains main supply of information. Both of these tactics resurfaced some(prenominal) times throughout the twentieth century, most notable in the teachings of Ernesto Che Guevara and Brazilian revolutionary Carlos Marighella, but the question remains as to whom Michael Collins had the strongest link.Guevara was, like Collins, mingled in a fight on a largely rural island, and often stressed the importance of taking up the fighting outside the city (Guevara, 1961, pp. 1-2). Even though both rel ied heavily upon the tactics of the Flying Column, there was a significant difference whereas Collins guerrilla force only existed in the attack, Guevara had an actual army that could gain territory and form lines of resistance. Furthermore, Guevara actually had a chance to win his war through military means, unlike Collins and his ever-reinforced enemy. Collins idea of carefully selected executions was not unknown to Guevara, but it was in no way a key issue in his tactics.Marighella was facing an entirely unlike scenario, and thus devised new tactics to suit his needs. Fighting in heavy industrialized Brazil, he regarded the urban areas as the birthplace and battlefield of the guerrilla force (Marighella, 1969, p. 12). Like both of the others he subscribed to idea of the Flying Column, but unlike Guevara it was an autonomous unit, leaping only into existence when call upon (Marighella, 1969, p. 4). Marighella had no prospects of a traditional military victory, and like Collins he relied on the hidden warfare of surprise attacks, kidnapping and executions (Asprey, 1994, p.1089-90).To choose which of these later models is more consistent with Collins is apparently to choose the lesser of two evils. Guevara fought an entirely different enemy, but used the Flying Column with great success. Marighella again fought a different foe and utilize Collins idea of selective executions, but with less success. It seems that Marighella has the most to share with Collins. Although he lost his war, he took the most important part of Collins tactics and attempted to upchuck it into practice. Guevara merely adopted the foundational idea of small-unit fighting a concept far predating Michael Collins. The answer as to whether Michael Collins should be regarded as villain or patriot is to some extent answered in the final sentence of Fidel Castros defense speech of 1953 History will absolve me. An attempt to define any reformer as good or bad will always be biased by the outc ome of the conflict and our own political stance. However, technically Collins was a patriot by the very definition of the word he fought for (the majority of) his country. The fact that he won Ireland her